John 8:1-11 added passage?
John 8:1-11—”How can the Bible be reliable when this passage wasn’t in the earliest manuscripts?”Some critics of the Injīl point to passages like John 8:1-11 to “prove” that it has grave defects, since some ancient manuscripts add it as an appendix to Luke and others have omitted it completely. We have many reasons to believe that John 8:1-11 was originally part of John’s gospel where it stands today. The language and style of the passage is very consistent with the overall gospel, and it fits with the logical sequence of events. It is also important to put Mark 16:9-20 and John 8:1-11 in proper perspective—these two theologically insignificant passages are the only such portions of scripture which are under any major question, representing a tiny 0.0007% of scripture. The same critics often ignore the fact that the Qur’ān has very similar questionable passages. The Prophet honored Ibn Masood as the foremost Qur’ānic reciter:
Muhammad (pbuh) said, “Learn the Qur’ān from four: from Abdullah Ibn Masood, Salim, the freed slave of Abu Hudhaifa, Mu’dah bin Jabal, and Ubai bin Ka’b.” ( Sahih al-Bukhari , vol. 5, p.96.).This same Ibn Masood did not include Sura Fatihah, Al-Falaq or An-Nas as part of the Qur’ān. On the other hand, Ubayy’s copy included the following two extra suras in the Qur’ān , Sura al-Hafd and Sura Al-Khal’ :
- Suyuti, Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur’ān , Vol. 1, p.153, 186.
- Jalaluddin Suyuti, Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur’ān , Lahore: Idarah Islamiat, 1982, Vol. 1, p.524.
Trackback from your site.